Blakney v. Miami FDC et al
Larry Blakney |
Catherine Brewton, Miami FDC, Cat, Hartsville Police Dept, Shawn Hey and Sled Agency |
1:2020cv23289 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Lisette M Reid |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER OF DIRECTIONS TO CLERK RE: PRO SE COMPLAINT [ECF NO.1]. Closing Case as Improperly Opened. Denying as moot [ECF No. 3] MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Directing the Clerk to have the pro se complaint in this case filed in Case No. 20-CV-22034-SCOLA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 08/11/2020. See attached document for full details. (yar) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry Blakney. (scn) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (scn) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Catherine Brewton, Hartsville Police Dept, Shawn Hey, Miami FDC, Sled Agency filed by Larry Blakney. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed.(scn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.