MetLife Home Loans v. Schwartz
| Kenneth Schwartz |
| MetLife Home Loans |
| 1:2020cv23328 |
| August 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 Appellant's Metlife Home Loans Motion to Dismiss Appeal As Unripe, Without Prejudice, Or, In The Alternative To Stay The Appeal Pending Resolution Of Appeal Of Related Case Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (mcy)
|
| Filing 12 Reply in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Bankruptcy Appeal as Unripe, Without Prejudice, or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Appeal Pending Resolution of Appeal of Related Case and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by MetLife Home Loans. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Fialkoff, Kassia)Text Modified on 9/30/2020 (mee). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE / Partial Opposition by the Appellee Kenneth Schwartz to the Appellant's Motion to Dismiss or Stay the Appeal re #10 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Bankruptcy Appeal as Unripe, Without Prejudice, or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Appeal Pending Resolution of Appeal of Related Case and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Kenneth Schwartz. Replies due by 9/30/2020. (pcs) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Bankruptcy Appeal as Unripe, Without Prejudice, or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Appeal Pending Resolution of Appeal of Related Case and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by MetLife Home Loans. Responses due by 10/5/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fialkoff, Kassia) |
| Filing 9 Bankruptcy Notice of Entry pursuant to Rule 8018 and NOTICE TO ATTORNEY - Pursuant to the Southern District of Florida Local Rules, and the Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Appellant has 30 days after the docketing of the Bankruptcy Transmittal of Designated Record to District Court to serve and file a brief. The Appellee shall serve and file a response brief within 30 days after service of Appellant's brief. The Appellant shall serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of the Appelle's brief. Appellant Brief due by 10/8/2020. (jc) |
| Filing 8 Bankruptcy Transmittal of Designated Record to District Court re #1 Bankruptcy Appeal filed by MetLife Home Loans (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Appellant Designation, #3 Appellant Desig. re: Claim #6, #4 Appellant Designation 45-285, #5 Appellant Designation RE 13-01288, #6 EXH. 65 MAIN, #7 EXH. 65 a, #8 EXH. 65 B, #9 EXH. 65 C, #10 EXH. 65 D, #11 EXH. 65 E, #12 EXH. 65 F, #13 EXH. 65 G, #14 EXH. 65 H, #15 EXH. 65 I, #16 EXH. 65 J, #17 EXH. 65 K, #18 EXH. 65 L, #19 EXH. 65 M, #20 EXH. 65 N, #21 EXH. 65 O, #22 EXH. 65 P, #23 EXH. 65 Q, #24 EXH. 65 R, #25 EXH. 65 S, #26 EXH. 65 T, #27 EXH. 65 U, #28 EXH. 65 V, #29 Appellee Desig.)(lle) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth Schwartz (Address Updated). (pcs) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by MetLife Home Loans (Fialkoff, Kassia) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Parties Re Administrative Order 2015-9 and Amendments to Federal Bankruptcy Rules and Local Rule 87.4 Re Processing of Bankruptcy Appeals (jc) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jc) |
| Filing 2 Bankruptcy Transmittal of re #1 Bankruptcy Appeal filed by MetLife Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet)(lle) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT (received), Bankruptcy Court case number 12-37089-BKC LMI, filed by MetLife Bank, N.A..(lle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MetLife Home Loans v. Schwartz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: Kenneth Schwartz | |
| Represented By: | Eric Scott Brumfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: MetLife Home Loans | |
| Represented By: | Kassia Fialkoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
