Gomez v. Wolf et al
Ramon Enrique Gomez |
Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and Acting Director of ICE |
1:2020cv23726 |
September 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Marcia G Cooke |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Acting Director of ICE, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security(mc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) FOR TONY PHAM acting Director of US ICE by Ramon Enrique Gomez (Oviedo-Reyes, Alfonso) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) FOR CHAD WOLF Secretary of DHS by Ramon Enrique Gomez (Oviedo-Reyes, Alfonso) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (scn) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. (scn) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 . Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13479245, filed by Ramon E. Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit IN SUPPORT OF MOTION, #2 Exhibit Motion for post conviction relief to vacate plea and Judgment)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Oviedo-Reyes, Alfonso) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.