Malcolm v. Verizon Wireless
| Richard Ralph Malcolm |
| Verizon Wireless |
| 1:2020cv24250 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robert N Scola |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER of Dismissal of USCA, DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Richard Ralph Malcolm has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules as to #6 Notice of Appeal, filed by Richard Ralph Malcolm, USCA # 20-14124-C (hh)
|
| Filing 7 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #6 Notice of Appeal, filed by Richard Ralph Malcolm. Date received by USCA: 11/3/2020. USCA Case Number: 20-14124-C. (apz) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #6 Notice of Appeal, Notice has been electronically mailed. (apz) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appeal as to #4 Order Dismissing Case by Richard Ralph Malcolm. FILING FEE: (NOT PAID). Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under Transcript Information. (apz) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance re #4 Order Dismissing Case. A copy of the Order was mailed to the Plaintiff. (jbs) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Closing Case. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 10/19/2020. See attached document for full details. (jbs)
|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 10/19/2020 in the amount of $ 400.00, receipt number FLS100216910 (asz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Verizon Wireless. Filing fees $ 400.00 not paid/no ifp filed, filed by Richard Ralph Malcolm. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summon(s))(drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Malcolm v. Verizon Wireless | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Verizon Wireless | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Ralph Malcolm | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
