Balbin v. Fellowship House et al
| Manuel Balbin |
| Rosemary Smith Hoel, Carlos Gimenez, Fellowship House, The Board of County Commissioners of Miami-Dade County, Melissa Sanon, Amy Miller and Alphonse Hayeck |
| 1:2020cv24535 |
| November 3, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Marcia G Cooke |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff owes the United States a debt of $350 which must be paid to the Clerk of the Court as funds become available. The jail/prison having custody of Plaintiff must make payments from the prisoner's account to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the full filing fee of $350 is paid. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 12/23/2020. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot Motion for Extension of Time and denying as premature request for an order allowing the case to proceed. #7 Plaintiff has filed a proper IFP motion. #8 Therefore, he does not need an extension of time for this purpose. Furthermore, the Court must screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), which it will do in turn. Therefore, any request to allow the case to proceed is premature. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 12/23/2020. (js05)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Manuel Balbin. (pes) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Second Extension of Time for Case to Proceed Forward with a Court Screening and Serving of all Defendants by Manuel Balbin. Responses due by 1/5/2021 (pes) |
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Plaintiff's new IFP motion is now due by 12/27/20. All other provisions of the Court's order denying the first IFP motion without prejudice, ECF No. 4, shall remain in full force and effect. Furthermore, if Plaintiff cannot obtain the required information due to the alleged COVID-19 lockdown, he is instructed that he may file an inmate request to obtain such information. If the Court does not receive the new, proper IFP motion by 12/27/20, it will dismiss the case. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 11/23/2020. (js05)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File IFP as to #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Manuel Balbin. (yha) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. On or before December 7, 2020, Plaintiff shall either pay the Clerk's filing fee of $400.00 or file an IFP motion on the form provided with this Order, together with an account statement showing his past six months of financial transactions. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 11/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP form) (daa)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Manuel Balbin. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Fellowship House, Carlos Gimenez, Alphonse Hayeck, Amy Miller, Melissa Sanon, Rosemary Smith Hoel, The Board of County Commissioners of Miami-Dade County. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Manuel Balbin.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.