Perez v. The Ride Experience, LLC et al
| Eric Perez |
| The Ride Experience, LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as The Advantaged, Nancy E. Maldonado-Yanez and Jose A. Maldonado |
| The Ride Experience, LLC |
| 1:2020cv24724 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald L Graham |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference and Trial Dates: Jury Trial set for 7/19/2021 in Miami Division before Senior Judge Donald L. Graham. Telephonic Calendar Call set for 7/14/2021 02:00 PM before Senior Judge Donald L. Graham. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 6/16/2021 02:00 PM before Senior Judge Donald L. Graham. Signed by Senior Judge Donald L. Graham on 1/15/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Senior Judge Donald L. Graham: Telephonic Status Conference held on 1/13/2021. Court Reporter: Glenda Powers, 305-523-5022 / Glenda_Powers@flsd.uscourts.gov. (ra) |
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT by Eric Perez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - ELECTION TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FINAL DISPOSITION OF MOTIONS)(Prater, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Counterclaim by Eric Perez. (Prater, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE: Telephonic Status Conference set for 1/13/2021 02:00 PM before Senior Judge Donald L. Graham. Signed by Senior Judge Donald L. Graham on 12/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Eric Perez by Nancy E. Maldonado-Yanez, The Ride Experience, LLC, Jose A. Maldonado. Attorney Alexander Fernandez Fox added to party Jose A. Maldonado(pty:dft), Attorney Alexander Fernandez Fox added to party Nancy E. Maldonado-Yanez(pty:dft), Attorney Alexander Fernandez Fox added to party The Ride Experience, LLC(pty:dft). (Fox, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jose A. Maldonado, Nancy E. Maldonado-Yanez, The Ride Experience, LLC. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Donald L. Graham. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13879601, filed by Eric Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Non-Disclosure and Non-Compete Agreement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s) Jose A. Maldonado, Nancy E. Maldonado-Yanez, and The Ride Experience, LLC d/b/a The Advantaged)(Prater, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
