Espinosa v. Wolf et al
Plaintiff: Javier Espinosa
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), USCIS Miami Field Office and Chad Wolf
Case Number: 1:2020cv24855
Filed: November 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Altonaga
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Remand. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. In the event the N-400 application is not adjudicated by February 2, 2021, Plaintiff may move to reopen this matter. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/5/2021. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
January 5, 2021 Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 Defendant's MOTION to Remand Petition for Naturalization filed by Javier Espinosa. Replies due by 1/12/2021. (Smerdon, Bonnie)
January 5, 2021 Filing 11 Defendant's MOTION to Remand Petition for Naturalization by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), USCIS Miami Field Office, Chad Wolf. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Interview Notice, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Diaz, Natalie)
January 5, 2021 Civil Case Terminated, per #13 Order granting motion to remand. Closing Case. (ps1)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties: Joint Scheduling Report due by 1/11/2021. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 12/22/2020. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
December 17, 2020 Filing 9 Clerks Notice of Filing Fee refunded to Bonnie Smerdon in the amount of $47.00 on 12/17/2020 re 7 Clerks Notice of Reimbursement of Overpayment of Filing Fee (mua)
December 7, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Natalie Diaz on behalf of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), USCIS Miami Field Office, Chad Wolf. Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party USCIS Miami Field Office(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Chad Wolf(pty:dft). (Diaz, Natalie)
November 30, 2020 Filing 7 Clerks Notice of Reimbursement of Overpayment of Filing Fee. The Clerk will refund $47.00, receipt # AFLSDC-13927339, re #1 Petition (Complaint) RE: Government Agency, dated 11/25/2020. Case type changed from CV to MC. (ail)
November 30, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), USCIS Miami Field Office, Chad Wolf, U.S. Attorney (ail)
November 25, 2020 Filing 5 Notice of Compliance of Filing Fees $400.00, receipt number AFLSDC-13931068 re 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (Smerdon, Bonnie)
November 25, 2020 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The filing fee has not been paid (mc)
November 25, 2020 Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Insufficient filing fee paid. Filer must file a Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee and electronically pay the correct fees of $400.00 within 24 hours. (mc)
November 25, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mc)
November 25, 2020 Filing 1 First PETITION (Complaint) Judicial Naturalization RE: Government Agency USCIS. Filing fee $ 47.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13927339, filed by Javier Espinosa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibt 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #9 Summon(s) Summonses)(Smerdon, Bonnie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Espinosa v. Wolf et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Represented By: Natalie Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS Miami Field Office
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Represented By: Natalie Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Wolf
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Represented By: Natalie Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Javier Espinosa
Represented By: Bonnie Smerdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?