PETERSEN v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Plaintiff: AISHIA PETERSEN
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc. doing business as Champs Sports
Case Number: 1:2020cv24960
Filed: December 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Marcia G Cooke
Referring Judge: John J O'Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Compliance with Court Order by Foot Locker Retail, Inc. re #5 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other, (Mora, Martha)
January 27, 2021 Filing 15 Defendant's RESPONSE to #10 Statement of Claim by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Mora, Martha)
January 27, 2021 Filing 14 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Mora, Martha)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 1/14/2021. (bai)
January 12, 2021 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #11 Exhibits, #10 Statement for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mora, Martha)
January 3, 2021 Filing 11 EXHIBITS 1 to Statement of Claim 1 by AISHIA PETERSEN. Related document: #10 Statement filed by AISHIA PETERSEN.(Barros, Acacia)
December 22, 2020 Filing 10 Statement of: Claim by Ray Malhlberg re Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge by AISHIA PETERSEN re #5 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other, (Barros, Acacia)
December 21, 2020 Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline sa per DE 9 : Foot Locker Retail, Inc. response due 1/27/2020. (lk)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Foot LockerRetail, Inc. d/b/a Champs Sports shall file its response to the Complaint on or before January 27,2021. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 12/21/2020. (bai)
December 21, 2020 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Foot Locker Retail, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Foot Locker, Inc. for Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (Mora, Martha)
December 21, 2020 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint for Extension of Time to File a Response to the Complaint by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mora, Martha)
December 21, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Martha Rosa Mora on behalf of Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. Attorney Martha Rosa Mora added to party Foot Locker Retail, Inc.(pty:dft). (Mora, Martha)
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES Referring Case to Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 12/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (jbs)
December 7, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by AISHIA PETERSEN. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. served on 12/4/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. (Barros, Acacia)
December 4, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (jbs)
December 3, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs)
December 3, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief against Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13976021, filed by AISHIA PETERSEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) to be issued)(Barros, Acacia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PETERSEN v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc. doing business as Champs Sports
Represented By: Martha Rosa Mora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AISHIA PETERSEN
Represented By: Acacia Regina Silva Barros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?