Wilson v. Social Security
| Erica Wilson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2020cv25067 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jacqueline Becerra |
| Paul C Huck |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS SCHEDULING ORDER. THIS CAUSE has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to the administrative procedures of the Court which govern the disposition of Social Security cases, ECF No. 2 . In order to ensure the orderly and efficient disposition of this matter the Court hereby ORDERS the following Scheduling Order: (1) Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment, setting forth the reasons for relief and including citations to the administrative record and relevant legal authorities, within thirty (30) days from the date that Defendant files an answer and the administrative record of the proceedings. (2) Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days after Plaintiff files the motion for summary judgment. (3) Plaintiff may respond to Defendant's motion for summary judgment and file a reply in support of Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment within fifteen (15) days after Defendant files the response and motion as set forth above. Notwithstanding Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff is not required to file a separate statement of facts nor does the factual recitation in the motion need to be in separately-numbered paragraphs. However, all factual assertions must include specific page citations from the Administrative Record using the number provided by the ECF system on the top right corner of the page. Non-compliance with any provision of this Order may subject the offending party and its attorney(s) to sanctions, including dismissal of claims or striking of defenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 1/21/2021. (nco)
|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by U.S.Marshals as to U.S.Attorney General served on 1/12/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. (mee) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by U.S. Marshals as to Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/12/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. See d.e. #7 for image. Text Modified on 1/15/2021 (mee). |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE by U.S.Marshals as to Andrew Saul. (mee) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by U.S.Marshals as to United States Attorney served on 1/7/2021, answer due 3/8/2021. Text Modified on 1/8/2021 (mee). |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ail) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service Ordered and Summonses NOT provided for USM Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 12/22/2020. See attached document for full details. (nco) QC Modified on 12/22/2020 (ail).
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with Service of Process by US Marshal( Responses due by 12/28/2020) by Erica Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Marshal Service Process forms)(mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Paul C. Huck and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Erica Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Supplement IFP with service USM Motion, #4 Affidavit IFP affidavit, #5 Supplement USM forms)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Freeman, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Erica Wilson | |
| Represented By: | Heather Freeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
