Dorsett v. Saul
| Dorothy Dorsett |
| Andrew Saul |
| 1:2020cv25071 |
| December 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Dorothy Dorsett. Andrew Saul served via U.S. Attorney's Office on via 2/4/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. (ail) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ail) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Dorothy Dorsett re #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (Palacios-Paredes, Katherine) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service ordered. Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 1/8/2021. See attached document for full details. (js02)
|
| Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres added per DE 2 . Motions referred to Judge Edwin G. Torres. (amb) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (amb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dorothy Dorsett. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Dorothy Dorsett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 IFP Application)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Palacios-Paredes, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dorsett v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dorothy Dorsett | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
