Tyler v. Dade Correctional Instituion, Officer Patterson et al
| Christepher Chad Tyler |
| Perez Dade Correctional Instutition, Officer Perez, Dade Correctional Instituion, Officer Patterson, Officer Patterson and Officer Perez |
| 1:2020cv25102 |
| December 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER of Dismissal, ( Amended Complaint due by 2/19/2021.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 2/2/2021. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Patterson, Perez, filed by Christepher Chad Tyler.(kpe) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Dismissal. The Complaint (D.E. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUTPREJUDICE. The Motion (D.E. 3) is DENIED AS MOOT. ( Amended Complaint due by 1/5/2021.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 12/22/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christepher Chad Tyler. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Dade Correctional Instituion, Officer Patterson, Perez Dade Correctional Instutition, Officer. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Christepher Chad Tyler.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
