Banuchi v. City of Homestead et al
| Altagracia Banuchi |
| City of Homestead and Anthony Green |
| 1:2020cv25133 |
| December 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lauren Fleischer Louis |
| K Michael Moore |
| Robert N Scola |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Altagracia Banuchi. (Davis, Michael)
|
|
Filing 18
RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION filed by Altagracia Banuchi. Replies due by 2/18/2021. (Davis, Michael)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE in Support re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION filed by City of Homestead, Anthony Green. (Stettin, Eric)
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #15 Order to Show Cause by City of Homestead, Anthony Green. (Flanigan, Anne)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Show Cause Response due by 2/19/2021. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 2/3/2021. See attached document for full details. (lk)
|
|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants #13 the Defendants' unopposed motion for an extension of time to reply to the Plaintiff's response to their motion to dismiss. The Defendants must file their reply on or before February 11, 2021. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (kbe)
|
|
Filing 13
Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To Reply In Support Of Motion To Dismiss by City of Homestead, Anthony Green. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Flanigan, Anne)
|
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION With Request for Hearing filed by Altagracia Banuchi. Replies due by 2/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Public Records Request.9-10-2020)(Kuehne, Benedict)
|
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants #9 the Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss. The Plaintiffs' response is due on or before January 28, 2021. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (sbn)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 1/8/2021. Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis and Chief Judge K. Michael Moore no longer assigned to case Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/8/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
|
Filing 9
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION for 14 Days by Altagracia Banuchi. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Extension of Time)(Kuehne, Benedict)
|
|
Filing 8
Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by City of Homestead, Anthony Green (Flanigan, Anne)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by City of Homestead, Anthony Green. Responses due by 1/14/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - State Attorney's Office Close-out Memo)(Flanigan, Anne)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Altagracia Banuchi (Davis, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREN FLEISCHER LOUIS. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis' discovery procedures. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/17/2020. (tgr)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of a Notice of Removal. Counsel for the removing party is hereby ORDERED to forward a copy of this Order to all other parties. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a Joint Scheduling Report. The report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial and the estimated number of days required for trial. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer, or may offer, if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (A) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (B) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address, and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibility of a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report may result in remand or dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The filing of a motion to dismiss, or other motion, does not toll the time for filing a joint scheduling report. Counsel for the non-removing party must file a motion to remand the case on the basis of any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction within thirty (30) days after the filing of the Notice of Removal. The parties are hereby on notice that this Court requires all filings to be formatted in 12 point Times New Roman font and double spaced, including any footnotes, with one-inch margins on all sides. Failure to follow these formatting guidelines may result in the filing being stricken, any opposing filing being granted by default, and the imposition of other sanctions, including attorney's fees and costs. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/17/2020. (tgr)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric Lawrence Stettin on behalf of City of Homestead, Anthony Green (Stettin, Eric)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - First Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14047359, filed by City of Homestead, Anthony Green. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 2 - Order Granting Leave to Amend Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - First Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4 - State Court Filings)(Flanigan, Anne)(Answer Filed) Modified text on 12/17/2020 (jbs).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
