Johnson v. Carnival Corporation
Natasha Johnson |
Carnival Corporation and Carnival Corporation a Panamanian Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Lines |
1:2020cv25157 |
December 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Edwin G Torres |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 2/12/2021. See attached document for full details. (mdc) |
Filing 11 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Carnival Corporation (Mebane, Scott) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Jury Trial set for 1/31/2022 before Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Calendar Call set for 1/25/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Mediation Deadline 10/8/2021. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Edwin Torres for all discovery matters. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 2/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee) |
Filing 9 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Natasha Johnson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hernandez, Eduardo) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates by Natasha Johnson (Hernandez, Eduardo) |
Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Carnival Corporation. Attorney Scott P. Mebane added to party Carnival Corporation(pty:dft). (Mebane, Scott) |
Filing 6 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties by 2/12/2021. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/12/2021. See attached document for full details. (ps1) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Natasha Johnson. Carnival Corporation served on 1/11/2021, answer due 2/1/2021. (Hernandez, Eduardo) |
Filing 4 ORDER that on or before March 18, 2021, Plaintiff shall perfect service upon Defendant or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to perfect service of process. Failure to file proof of service or show good cause by March 18 will result in a dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 1/12/2021. See attached document for full details. (wc) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Carnival Corporation. (mee) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carnival Corporation. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14063924, filed by Natasha Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Hernandez, Eduardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.