Pedro v. Transdev Rail, Inc.
| Levensaint Pedro |
| Transdev Rail, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv25221 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Levensaint Pedro. Transdev Rail, Inc. waiver sent on 1/11/2021, answer due 3/12/2021. (Kroner, Jonathan) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Stephen J. Fitzgerald, Esq.. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/4/2021. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Stephen J. Fitzgerald. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-14095768 by Levensaint Pedro. Responses due by 1/7/2021 (Attachments: #1 Certification Attorney Fitzgerald's R 4(b) certification)(Kroner, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Levensaint Pedro re 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case of filing Civil Cover Sheet (Kroner, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Stephen J. Fitzgerald, mailing date December 23, 2020, (pt) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TRANSDEV RAIL, INC. (not against Levensaint Pedro. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14088875, filed by Levensaint Pedro.(Kroner, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pedro v. Transdev Rail, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Transdev Rail, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Levensaint Pedro | |
| Represented By: | Stephen J. Fitzgerald |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Evan Kroner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
