Driessen v. Miami-Dade County School Board
| Rochelle Driessen |
| Miami-Dade County School Board |
| 1:2020cv25311 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #6 Plaintiff's #6 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order Dismissing Case #4 , the Court finds Plaintiff's claims to be frivolous. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 7 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #5 Notice of Appeal, filed by Rochelle Driessen. Date received by USCA: 1/15/21. USCA Case Number: 21-10163-D. (hh) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Permission to Appeal in forma pauperis by Rochelle Driessen. (hh) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appeal by Rochelle Driessen as to #4 Order Dismissing Case. Filing fee $ 505.00. Receipt#: FEE NOT PAID. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under Transcript Information. (hh) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #5 Notice of Appeal. Notice has been electronically mailed. (hh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles See attached document for full details. (hs01)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rochelle Driessen. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Miami-Dade County School Board. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Rochelle Driessen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Driessen v. Miami-Dade County School Board | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rochelle Driessen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Miami-Dade County School Board | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
