Jackson v. Carnival Corporation
Sharon Jackson |
Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Line doing business as Carnival |
1:2021cv20062 |
January 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jacqueline Becerra |
James Lawrence King |
P.I.: Other |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Discovery due by 3/30/2022., Motions due by 4/4/2022., Pretrial Stipulation due by 5/27/2022., Jury Trial set for 8/22/2022 09:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Calendar Call set for 8/18/2022 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King., Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/3/2022 10:15 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King. All hearings to be held before Judge King will be held in Courtroom II, Eleventh Floor.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra for Discovery Matters. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 1/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (jw) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Carnival Corporation. Attorney Donnise DeSouza Webb added to party Carnival Corporation(pty:dft). (Webb, Donnise) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Sharon Jackson. Carnival Corporation served on 1/7/2021, answer due 1/28/2021. (Tylka, Tyler) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Carnival Corporation. (kpe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Line and/or Carnival. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14164017, filed by Sharon Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Tylka, Tyler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jackson v. Carnival Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sharon Jackson | |
Represented By: | Tyler Joseph Tylka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Line doing business as Carnival | |
Represented By: | Donnise DeSouza Webb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.