Oyarzun v. Miami Dade County Sea Port
Erika D. Oyarzun |
Miami Dade County Sea Port |
1:2021cv20121 |
January 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Paul C Huck |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUA SPONTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Complaint ECF No. #1 is DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY. Signed by Senior Judge Paul C. Huck on 3/3/2021. See attached document for full details. (amb) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Statement from former Counsel by Erika D. Oyarzun re #9 Administrative Order, (amb) |
Filing 9 SUA SPONTE ORDER. Plaintiff SHALL contact her former counsel and provide this Court with a statement from her former counsel that identifies when the Right to Sue Letter was received. Signed by Senior Judge Paul C. Huck on 2/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (amb) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Sue Letter, Request/Right to Sue and Attorney Information by Erika D. Oyarzun (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (amb) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 MOTION to Supplement the Record. Signed by Senior Judge Paul C. Huck on 2/3/2021. See attached document for full details. (ail) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Supplement the Record by Erika D. Oyarzun. (amb) |
Filing 5 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS. ORDER denying #4 Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program; denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Paul C. Huck on 1/21/2021. See attached document for full details. (amb) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Erika D. Oyarzun. (pcs) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Erika D. Oyarzun. (pcs) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Paul C. Huck. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Miami Dade County Sea Port. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Erika D. Oyarzun. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(pcs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Oyarzun v. Miami Dade County Sea Port | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Miami Dade County Sea Port | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Erika D. Oyarzun | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.