Roberts v. Moody et al
Salomon David Roberts and Solomon David Roberts |
Ashley Moody and Marbely Hernandez |
1:2021cv20123 |
January 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jose E Martinez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Petition for leave of court to vacate it's Order of Dismissal and allow Pro Se Litigant to Amend his Civil Complaint re #5 Order Dismissing Case (Responses due by 2/16/2021) by Solomon David Roberts. (ebz) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/22/2021. (mws) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Solomon David Roberts. Responses due by 2/5/2021 (mc) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 and the case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/15/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Solomon David Roberts. (daa) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens by Solomon David Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(daa) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. (daa) |
Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Marbely Hernandez, Ashley Moody. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Solomon David Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.