SOTO v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. et al
| MARTA SOTO |
| HOLIDAY CVS, LLC d/b/a NAVARRO DISCOUNT PHARMACY, CVS PHARMACY, INC. and HOLIDAY CVS, LLC doing business as Navarro Discount Pharmacy |
| 1:2021cv20170 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Paul C Huck |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Clerks Notice to Filer re #5 Notice (Other). Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#7]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (lk) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Carlos Omar Gomez on behalf of MARTA SOTO. See image at DE #5 (lk) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, filed by MARTA SOTO. Replies due by 3/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Defendants Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit Request for Admissions, #4 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit 11 Circuit Court Docket)(Gomez, Carlos) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by MARTA SOTO Notice of Appearance filed by. Attorney Carlos Omar Gomez added to party MARTA SOTO(pty:pla). (Gomez, Carlos) |
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants Motion by noon on Friday, March 5, 2021. Signed by Senior Judge Paul C. Huck on 3/1/2021. See attached document for full details. (jbs)
|
| Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, by CVS PHARMACY, INC., HOLIDAY CVS, LLC. Responses due by 2/4/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - Defendant's Request for Admissions to Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit 4 - Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Request for Admissions, #5 Exhibit 5 - Plaintiff's Amended Complaint)(Liro, Jacob) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Paul C. Huck. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14216869, filed by HOLIDAY CVS, LLC d/b/a NAVARRO DISCOUNT PHARMACY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Composite Exhibit, #3 Exhibit 2 - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, #4 Exhibit 3 - Defendant's Request for Admissions, #5 Exhibit 4 - Plaintiff's Response to Request for Admissions, #6 Exhibit 5 - Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, #7 Exhibit 6 - CVS Pharmacy, Inc.'s 2020 Annual Report, #8 Exhibit 7 - Holiday CVS, LLC's 2020 Annual Report, #9 Exhibit 8 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Liro, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
