Raith v. Commissioner Of Social Security
German Raith |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2021cv20653 |
February 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Donald L Graham |
Chris M McAliley |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney General served on 4/2/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. (kpe) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed. Commissioner of Social Security served on 3/30/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. (kpe) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney served on 3/31/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. (kpe) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ebz) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance Summons Issued and placed in USMS FTL Box for pick up along with #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #1 Complaint, filed by German Raith (ebz) |
![]() |
Filing 5 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley per DE #4 . Motions referred to Judge Chris M. McAliley. (vjk) |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by German Raith. (ebz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Donald L. Graham. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by German Raith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Request for Extension and Confirmation, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s), #4 Supplement IFP Motion, #5 Affidavit IFP Financial Affidavit, #6 Supplement USM Forms)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Freeman, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Raith v. Commissioner Of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: German Raith | |
Represented By: | Heather Freeman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.