Rapp v. Davol Inc.
| Michael Rapp |
| Davol Inc. and C.R.Bard Inc., |
| 1:2021cv20757 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald L Graham |
| James Lawrence King |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Attorney information does not match initiating document. The name of the attorney submitting the complaint does not match the signature on the pdf document. The attorney listed on the initiating document has been added. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James L. King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Text Modified on 2/25/2021 (mee). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Davol Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14438235, filed by Michael Rapp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rousso, Darren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
