ROJAS v. Miami Pool Tech, Inc. et al
JOSE m. ROJAS |
Miami Pool Tech, Inc. and CARLOS HERNANDEZ |
1:2021cv21090 |
March 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ursula Ungaro |
Labor: Fair Standards |
15 U.S.C. § 0002 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MOTION to Amend/Correct #18 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint IN RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS by JOSE m. ROJAS. Responses due by 6/3/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - First Amended Complaint)(Palma, Zandro) |
Filing 18 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Miami Pool Tech, Inc.. Responses due by 5/28/2021 (Georges-Pierre, Anthony) |
Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as per DE #17 : Settlement Conference set for 5/21/2021 at 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. (lk) |
![]() |
Filing 16 Defendant's RESPONSE to #11 Statement of Claim by Miami Pool Tech, Inc.. (Georges-Pierre, Anthony) |
![]() |
Filing 14 Clerks Notice to Filer re #10 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint . Wrong Motion Relief(s) Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) |
Set Deadline per DE #15 Scheduling Conference set for 7/16/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Ursula Ungaro. (jbs) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time TO SERVE DEFENDANT re #6 Scheduling Order, by JOSE m. ROJAS. Responses due by 5/7/2021 (Palma, Zandro) |
Filing 12 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule by JOSE m. ROJAS (Palma, Zandro) |
Filing 11 Statement of: Claim by JOSE m. ROJAS re #5 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, (Palma, Zandro) |
Filing 10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Miami Pool Tech, Inc.. Responses due by 5/6/2021 (Georges-Pierre, Anthony) Modified Relief on 4/26/2021 (ls). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by JOSE m. ROJAS. Miami Pool Tech, Inc. served on 3/26/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Palma, Zandro) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Anthony Maximillien Georges-Pierre on behalf of Miami Pool Tech, Inc.. Attorney Anthony Maximillien Georges-Pierre added to party Miami Pool Tech, Inc.(pty:dft). (Georges-Pierre, Anthony) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Miami Pool Tech, Inc. (jbs) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Miami Pool Tech, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14543047, filed by JOSE m. ROJAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Palma, Zandro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.