Brito v. Hayday, Inc. et al
Carlos Brito |
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., Government Discount, Inc., Party City Corporation, El Prado, Corp., Hayday, Inc. and CSP Commercial I, LLC. |
1:2021cv21243 |
April 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Marcia G Cooke |
John J O'Sullivan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12182 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to file Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses filed by Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. re #18 Answer to Complaint by Carlos Brito. Responses due by 6/9/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file the Stipulation of Dismissal)(Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 21 Statement of: Claim by Carlos Brito re #14 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit A)(Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 20 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 16] by Government Discount, Inc.. (Chotiner, Adam) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice of Settlement with Defendant, Party City Corporation by Carlos Brito (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 18 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint First Amended Complaint [D.E. 16] by Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.. (Warner, Susan) |
Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Carlos Brito. CSP Commercial I, LLC. waiver sent on 4/28/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 16 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against CSP Commercial I, LLC. filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Carlos Brito.(Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File An Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall separately file the amended complaint within five days of the date of this Order. Clerks Notice: Filer must separately re-file the amended pleading pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, unless otherwise ordered by the Judge. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/29/2021. (btn) |
Filing 14 ORDER Of Referral And Order Regarding Court Practices And Procedures. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint. Defendant Government Discount, Inc. shall file its response to the Complaint on or before May 18, 2021. No further extensions of time will be granted. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/28/2021. (btn) |
Filing 12 Plaintiff's MOTION to Amend/Correct PLAINTIFFS UNOPPOSED MOTION TO LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT by Carlos Brito. Responses due by 5/12/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Government Discount, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chotiner, Adam) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam S. Chotiner on behalf of Government Discount, Inc.. Attorney Adam S. Chotiner added to party Government Discount, Inc.(pty:dft). (Chotiner, Adam) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Susan Virginia Warner on behalf of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.. Attorney Susan Virginia Warner added to party Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.(pty:dft). (Warner, Susan) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Carlos Brito. El Prado, Corp. served on 4/6/2021, answer due 4/27/2021. (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Carlos Brito. Government Discount, Inc. served on 4/6/2021, answer due 4/27/2021. (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Carlos Brito. Party City Corporation served on 4/6/2021, answer due 4/27/2021. (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Carlos Brito. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. served on 4/6/2021, answer due 4/27/2021. (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Carlos Brito. Hayday, Inc. served on 4/7/2021, answer due 4/28/2021. (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to El Prado, Corp., Government Discount, Inc., Hayday, Inc., Party City Corporation, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.. (kpe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against El Prado, Corp., Government Discount, Inc., Hayday, Inc., Party City Corporation, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14570275, filed by Carlos Brito. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s), #6 Summon(s))(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.