Rodriguez v. American Civil Liberty Union et al
| Dario Micheal Rodriguez |
| Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and American Civil Liberty Union |
| 1:2021cv21422 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of filing Exhibits as added evidence by Dario Micheal Rodriguez to #4 MOTION for Reconsideration re #3 Order Dismissing Case (ebz) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Dario Micheal Rodriguez (Address Updated) (ebz) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Reconsideration or Modify re #3 Order Dismissing Case by Dario Micheal Rodriguez. (ebz) |
Filing 3
ORDER. Petitioner Dario Michael Rodriguez's Petition for Writ of Mandamus [ECF No. #1 ] is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 4/22/2021. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. (daa) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Dario Micheal Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Affidavit)(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
