GLENN v. CITY OF MIAMI et al
| MICHELLE GLENN |
| CITY OF MIAMI and MARIO F. NUNEZ |
| 1:2021cv21429 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against CITY OF MIAMI, MARIO F. NUNEZ filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by MICHELLE GLENN.(Miller, Caroline) |
Filing 13
ORDER denying as moot #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting #12 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Clerks Notice: Filer must separately re-file the amended pleading pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, unless otherwise ordered by the Judge. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/8/2021. See attached document for full details. (mmd)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct by MICHELLE GLENN. Responses due by 6/18/2021 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Second Amended Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Miller, Caroline) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS #9 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM for Count III by CITY OF MIAMI. Responses due by 6/9/2021 (Panoff, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying as moot #6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 5/19/2021. See attached document for full details. (mmd)
|
| Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MICHELLE GLENN.(Miller, Caroline) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Luis Fernandez on behalf of MARIO F. NUNEZ. Attorney Luis Fernandez added to party MARIO F. NUNEZ(pty:dft). (Fernandez, Luis) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jose Javier Teurbe-Tolon on behalf of MARIO F. NUNEZ. Attorney Jose Javier Teurbe-Tolon added to party MARIO F. NUNEZ(pty:dft). (Teurbe-Tolon, Jose) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM for Count III by CITY OF MIAMI. Responses due by 5/19/2021 (Panoff, Stephanie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kevin Renard Jones on behalf of CITY OF MIAMI. Attorney Kevin Renard Jones added to party CITY OF MIAMI(pty:dft). (Jones, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephanie Kaplan Panoff on behalf of CITY OF MIAMI. Attorney Stephanie Kaplan Panoff added to party CITY OF MIAMI(pty:dft). (Panoff, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CITY OF MIAMI, MARIO F. NUNEZ. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF MIAMI, MARIO F. NUNEZ. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14606148, filed by MICHELLE GLENN. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Caroline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
