Haile et al v. AT&T et al
| John Haile, Dr. J. Christian Hail and J. Christian Hail |
| Southern Federal & Loan Assoc, Mark Inch, Bank of America, AT&T, State of Florida, Estate of F.J. Haile, FDOC Directors, M.C. Haile, BMW of Ocala, Inspector General, D.S.A., John Haile Jr. trusts, L.H. Mackie and S.S.A. |
| 1:2021cv21505 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Complaint [ECF No. #1 ] is DISMISSED without prejudice under 1915(g). The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. All pending deadlines and hearings are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 4/26/2021. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Haile. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against AT&T, BMW of Ocala, Bank of America, D.S.A., Estate of F.J. Haile, FDOC Directors, M.C. Haile, Mark Inch, Inspector General, John Haile Jr. trusts, L.H. Mackie, S.S.A., Southern Federal & Loan Assoc, State of Florida. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by John Haile, J. Christian Hail.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
