Rodriguez v. Florida Concrete Unlimited, Inc.
Plaintiff: Vivianne Rodriguez
Defendant: Florida Concrete Unlimited, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv21546
Filed: April 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Ursula Ungaro
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0206
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER of Dismissal re #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; Dismissing all Claims without prejudice; granting #7 Motion for Clarification. Striking #6 Order; Administratively Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 5/7/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls)
May 6, 2021 Filing 7 Plaintiff's MOTION for clarification #6 Order Dismissing Case by Vivianne Rodriguez. Responses due by 5/20/2021 (Richards, Jordan)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 "STRICKEN" ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Closing Case. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. All future hearings are CANCELLED. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 5/6/2021. See attached document for full details. (lk) Modified on 5/10/2021 (ls). (per DE #8 )
May 5, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Vivianne Rodriguez (Richards, Jordan)
April 26, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Vivianne Rodriguez. Florida Concrete Unlimited, Inc. served on 4/23/2021, answer due 5/14/2021. (Richards, Jordan)
April 22, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Florida Concrete Unlimited, Inc. (scn)
April 22, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn)
April 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Florida Concrete Unlimited, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14627325, filed by Vivianne Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) as to Florida Concrete Unlimited, Inc.)(Richards, Jordan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Florida Concrete Unlimited, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Concrete Unlimited, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vivianne Rodriguez
Represented By: Melissa Jane Scott
Represented By: Jake Slome Blumstein
Represented By: Jordan Lee Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?