Tartabull v. United States of America
| Francisco Abreu Tartabull |
| United States of America |
| 1:2021cv21606 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Cecilia M Altonaga |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
FINAL JUDGMENT. Pursuant to the Court's Order [ECF No. #7 ] denying Movant, Francisco Abreu Tartabull's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. [Section] 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [ECF No. #1 ], it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is entered in favor of Respondent and against Movant. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 5/31/2021. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER. Movant, Francisco Abreu Tartabull's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. [Section] 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [ECF No. #1 ] is DENIED. A certificate of appealability shall not issue. Final judgment shall issue by separate order. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 5/31/2021. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Motion (Complaint) to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Clark, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher Clark on behalf of United States of America. Attorney Christopher Clark added to party United States of America(pty:dft). (Clark, Christopher) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that on or before May 28, 2021, Respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why the Motion to Vacate Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [Section] 2255 should not be granted. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 4/26/2021. See attached document for full details. (wc)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER PROVIDING INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 4/26/2021. See attached document for full details. (wc)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. (daa) |
| Filing 1 MOTION (Complaint) to Vacate Sentence (2255). NOTE: All further docketing is to be done in the civil case. (Criminal Case # 1:19-cr-20605-CMA), filed by Francisco Abreu Tartabull. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support)(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tartabull v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Francisco Abreu Tartabull | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2255 US Attorney |
| Represented By: | Christopher Clark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
