Optical Licensing LLC v. Sourceability North America LLC
| Optical Licensing LLC |
| Sourceability North America LLC |
| 1:2021cv21627 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Chris M McAliley |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (mee) |
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER DISMISSING CASE. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal. #7 . Upon review of the notice and the record, the Court ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All deadlines and hearings are CANCELED. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 6/2/2021. (shy)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice by Optical Licensing LLC (Wernow, Howard) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF REFERRAL AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Chris M.McAliley for all discovery disputes and non-dispositive pretrial motions. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 4/29/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Optical Licensing LLC (Wernow, Howard) |
| Filing 4 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (mee) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sourceability North America LLC. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sourceability North America LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14642222, filed by Optical Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-US6791898, #2 Exhibit B-Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summon(s))(Wernow, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Optical Licensing LLC v. Sourceability North America LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Optical Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sourceability North America LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
