Coleman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
| Shaw Vale Coleman |
| J. Dawson, J-Pay Corporation, Warden D. Snider, Warden Christopher Edelen, Officer K. Pierce, Colonel J. Robinson, Secretary Representative, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, M.L. Keen, Walter Mock, Bryant Goodwin, G. Brock, Sergeant D. Hall and Colonel Mills |
| 1:2021cv21717 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Any pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. The Clerk of Court is ordered to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 5/12/2021. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against G. Brock, J. Dawson, Christopher Edelen, Bryant Goodwin, D. Hall, J-Pay Corporation, M.L. Keen, Mills, Walter Mock, K. Pierce, J. Robinson, Secretary Representative, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, D. Snider. Filing fee $ 402.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Shaw Vale Coleman.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
