Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
Jahnika T Smith |
Officer Nathan A. Pollock, Quiana S Palacios, Florida Department of Corrections, Francisco J Acosta, Angel K Gholston and South Florida Reception Center |
1:2021cv21749 |
May 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Florida Department of Corrections. Attorney Christopher John Whitelock added to party Florida Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (Whitelock, Christopher) |
![]() |
Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings Florida Department of Corrections answer/response due 7/9/2021; Angel K Gholston answer/response due 7/9/2021; Nathan A. Pollock answer/response due 7/9/2021; South Florida Reception Center answer/response due 7/9/2021. (cqs) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer by Jahnika T Smith (Miller, Caroline) |
![]() |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jahnika T Smith. Francisco J Acosta served on 6/1/2021, answer due 6/22/2021; Florida Department of Corrections served on 5/18/2021, answer due 6/8/2021; Angel K Gholston served on 5/20/2021, answer due 6/10/2021; Nathan A. Pollock served on 5/18/2021, answer due 6/8/2021; South Florida Reception Center served on 5/18/2021, answer due 6/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service (Pollock), #2 Affidavit of Service (Acosta), #3 Affidavit of Service (FLD), #4 Affidavit of Service (Gholston))(Miller, Caroline) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (mcy) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Francisco J Acosta, Florida Department of Corrections, Angel K Gholston, Quiana S Palacios, Nathan A. Pollock, South Florida Reception Center. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jahnika T Smith. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14669961, filed by Jahnika T Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s), #6 Summon(s), #7 Summon(s))(Miller, Caroline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.