Rodriguez v. Evanston Insurance Company
| Carlos Rodriguez |
| Evanston Insurance Company |
| 1:2021cv21774 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Carlos Rodriguez. (Pardo, Erika)
|
|
Filing 11
Defendant's RESPONSE to #8 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court by Evanston Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Rivero, Michael)
|
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Scheduling Report and Proposed Scheduling Order. The parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report within fourteen days after a ruling on #8 Plaintiff's Motion for Remand is issued. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 9
Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to file joint scheduling report and proposed scheduling order by Carlos Rodriguez. Responses due by 6/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Pardo, Erika)
|
|
Filing 8
Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court by Carlos Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Estimate, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(Pardo, Erika)
|
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before June 8, 2021, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 6
Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or, Alternatively, for Failure to Join an Indispensable Party by Evanston Insurance Company. Responses due by 6/1/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Rivero, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER. On or before May 18, 2021, the parties shall separately refile any pending motions previously filed in state court. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 3
Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Documents Improperly Arranged. The Filer did not properly attach the Notice of Removal. Future filings must comply with the CM/ECF Civil Case Opening Guide. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (jao)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Carlos Rodriguez vs. Evanston Insurance Company) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14676840, filed by Evanston Insurance Company. No Answer and/or Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Rivero, Michael) Modified on 5/11/2021 (jao).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Evanston Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Evanston Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael J Rivero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlos Rodriguez | |
| Represented By: | Erika Leigh Pardo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
