Edmond et al v. Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and District Director of Miami Field Office, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
TYRONE E. EDMOND and DAIANA IVANIUSHCHENKO |
SECRETARY Alejandro MAYORKAS, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Acting Director Tracy Renaud, District Director BRETT RINEHART and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
1:2021cv22073 |
June 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
John J O'Sullivan |
Kathleen M Williams |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus against Alejandro MAYORKAS, BRETT RINEHART, Tracy Renaud, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Filing fee $ 402.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-14738730, payment transferred from : 21-cv-22073-XXXX EDMOND et al v. MAYORKAS et al, filed by TYRONE E. EDMOND, DAIANA IVANIUSHCHENKO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Arteaga-Gomez, Rossana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.