Davis v. Hall et al
| Joshua A. Davis |
| J. Dawson, Colonel Albert Scarpati, Christopher Welsh, Severson, Tina Roberts, J. Robinson, Lieutenant J. Chavarria, Warden Derek Snider, Lieutenant Sharon Milliken, Sergeant Boone, Megan Spry, Sergeant D. Hall, Moses Lamar Frost, C. Jean-Pierre and G. Brock |
| 1:2021cv22312 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 7/8/2021 in the amount of $ 402.00, receipt number FLS100232449. (vt) |
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH DETAILED AFFIDAVIT. Filing Fee due by 7/25/2021. Motions due by 7/25/2021. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/25/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Boone, G. Brock, J. Chavarria, J. Dawson, Moses Lamar Frost, D. Hall, C. Jean-Pierre, Sharon Milliken, Tina Roberts, J. Robinson, Albert Scarpati, Severson, Derek Snider, Megan Spry, Christopher Welsh. Filing fee $ 402.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Joshua A. Davis.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.