Orbsat Corp. v. Seifert
| ORBSAT CORP. |
| Thomas Seifert |
| 1:2021cv22436 |
| July 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in light of Plaintiff's #19 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 20
NOTICE of Striking #17 Notice of Attorney Appearance filed by Orbsat Corp., 18 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney,, by Orbsat Corp. (Phillips, Gary)
|
|
Filing 19
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Thomas Seifert, filed by Orbsat Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Employment Agreement 3-11-21, #2 Exhibit B Employment Agreement 6-2-21)(Andrews, George)
|
|
Filing 18
Clerks Notice to Filer re #17 Notice of Attorney Appearance. Login/Signature Block Violation; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - The name of attorney e-filing this document via their CM/ECF login does not match the name of attorney on the signature block of the document. The name used for login must match the typed name on signature block of the document. This filing is a violation of Section 3J(1) of CM/ECF Admin Procedures and Local Rule 5.1(b). Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then refile document pursuant to CM/ECF Admin Procedures and Local Rules. (scn)
|
|
Filing 17
(STRICKEN PER DE#20) NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by George N. Andrews on behalf of Orbsat Corp. (Andrews, George) Text Modified on 9/2/2021 (scn).
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE by Orbsat Corp. re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), . Attorney George N. Andrews added to party Orbsat Corp.(pty:pla). (Andrews, George)
|
|
Filing 15
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #13 Defendant's Motion for Clarification of Paperless Order [DE 12] in light of Defendant's #14 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 14
Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Thomas Seifert. Responses due by 8/24/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Goldman, Jason)
|
|
Filing 13
Defendant's MOTION for clarification 12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer, by Thomas Seifert. Responses due by 8/10/2021 (Goldman, Jason)
|
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's [1-1] Complaint on or before August 10, 2021. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 11
REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 Defendant's MOTION to Reassign Case and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Thomas Seifert. (Walls, Tanesha)
|
|
Filing 10
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Complaint by Thomas Seifert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Goldman, Jason)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey Bruce Shalek on behalf of ORBSAT CORP. (Shalek, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Tanesha LaShay Marie Walls on behalf of Thomas Seifert (Walls, Tanesha)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ruben Martin Saenz on behalf of Thomas Seifert (Saenz, Ruben)
|
|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to Motion re #5 Defendant's MOTION to Reassign Case and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by ORBSAT CORP.. Attorney Jeffrey Bruce Shalek added to party ORBSAT CORP.(pty:pla). Replies due by 7/21/2021. (Shalek, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 5
Defendant's MOTION to Reassign Case and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Thomas Seifert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Goldman, Jason)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Thomas Seifert (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1) (Goldman, Jason)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint for Damages) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14823566, filed by Thomas Seifert. (No Answer filed/No Motion to Dismiss filed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldman, Jason) Text Modified on 7/7/2021 (scn).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
