Rivasplata v. Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc.
Plaintiff: Maria Rivasplata
Defendant: Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc. doing business as Financial Recovery Services, Inc..
Case Number: 1:2021cv22467
Filed: July 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Marcia G Cooke
Referring Judge: Chris M McAliley
2 Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/30/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
August 30, 2021 Filing 19 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Maria Rivasplata (Patti, Thomas)
August 30, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE of Striking #16 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Maria Rivasplata by Maria Rivasplata (Patti, Thomas)
August 30, 2021 Filing 17 Clerks Notice to Filer re #16 Stipulation of Dismissal. Login/Signature Block Violation; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - The name of attorney e-filing this document via their CM/ECF login does not match the name of attorney on the signature block of the document. The name used for login must match the typed name on signature block of the document. This filing is a violation of Section 3J(1) of CM/ECF Admin Procedures and Local Rule 5.1(b). Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then refile document pursuant to CM/ECF Admin Procedures and Local Rules. (mee)
August 30, 2021 Filing 16 STRICKEN-STIPULATION of Dismissal by Maria Rivasplata (Patti, Thomas) Modified on 8/31/2021 (mee). Per d.e. #18 .
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. This action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal by August 27, 2021. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/4/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
August 3, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement by Maria Rivasplata (Patti, Thomas)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER TO FILE JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/3/2021. See attached document for full details. (lbc)
August 2, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement by Maria Rivasplata (Patti, Thomas)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 7/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
July 28, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 7/28/2021. (jhy)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley for all further proceedings. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 7/27/2021. See attached document for full details. (mkr)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Transferring case to Judge Raag Singhal for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 7/27/2021. Judge Marcia G. Cooke no longer assigned to case Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 7/27/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 7/19/2021. See attached document for full details. (lbc)
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Defendant will respond to Plaintiff's complaint by August 6, 2021. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 7/19/2021. (cpo)
July 16, 2021 Filing 5 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc. (Canter, Ronald)
July 14, 2021 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Canter, Ronald)
July 9, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc. (Canter, Ronald)
July 9, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
July 9, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Maria Rivasplata v. Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc. d/b/a Financial Recovery Services, Inc.) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14832806, filed by Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc., d/b/a Financial Recovery Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint)(Canter, Ronald) Modified Text on 7/9/2021 (cds). No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rivasplata v. Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Rivasplata
Represented By: Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi
Represented By: Thomas John Patti, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc. doing business as Financial Recovery Services, Inc..
Represented By: Ronald S. Canter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?