Hernandez v. Miami-Dade County et al
| Michael Hernandez |
| Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade Police Department and Pete A Taylor |
| 1:2021cv22656 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| James Lawrence King |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade Police Department. (Viciana, Ana)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Michael Hernandez. Pete A Taylor served on 9/9/2021, answer due 9/30/2021. (Horenstein, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Michael Hernandez. Replies due by 9/17/2021. (Horenstein, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Pete A Taylor. (scn)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion. Responses due by 9/10/2021 Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 8/27/2021. See attached document for full details. (jw)
|
|
Filing 6
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #5 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Michael Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Horenstein, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 5
Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade Police Department. Responses due by 8/27/2021 (Viciana, Ana)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document Miami-Dade County. Answer due 8/13/2021; Miami-Dade Police Department. Answer due 8/13/2021. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 7/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (jw)
|
|
Filing 3
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Viciana, Ana)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14870696, filed by Miami-Dade Police Department, Miami-Dade County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Served Process on Miami-Dade County and Miami-Dade Police Department, #4 Exhibit State Court Filings)(Viciana, Ana)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
