Cannon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff: Kendrick Cannon
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 1:2021cv22657
Filed: July 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2021 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Prudential Insurance Company of America identifying Corporate Parent Prudential Financial, Inc., Other Affiliate The Prudential Insurance Company of America for The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Acree, William)
September 7, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Acree, William)
September 7, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William Cleveland Acree, II on behalf of The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Attorney William Cleveland Acree, II added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft). (Acree, William)
August 23, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Kendrick Cannon. The Prudential Insurance Company of America served on 8/17/2021, answer due 9/7/2021. (Alters, Rachel)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 7/23/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
July 23, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (mee)
July 23, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee)
July 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14870870, filed by Kendrick Cannon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit Disability Policy)(Alters, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cannon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendrick Cannon
Represented By: Rachel Alters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Represented By: William Cleveland Acree, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?