Guasto v. I.C. System, Inc.
Plaintiff: Nicholas Guasto
Defendant: I.C. System, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv22689
Filed: July 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Chris M McAliley
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2021 Filing 8 STATUS REPORT (Removal Status Report) by I.C. System, Inc. (McHale, Charles)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters AND NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 8/11/2021. See attached document for full details. (cds)
August 2, 2021 Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by I.C. System, Inc. (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta)
August 2, 2021 Filing 5 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by I.C. System, Inc. (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta)
August 2, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by I.C. System, Inc.. (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta)
July 27, 2021 Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Attorney information does not match initiating document. The name of the attorney submitting the complaint does not match the signature on the pdf document. The attorney listed on the initiating document has been added. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (cds)
July 26, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
July 26, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14875567, filed by I.C. System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 Summon(s), #4 Supplement State Court Complaint, #5 Supplement State Court Notice of Removal)(Golden, Dale) Modified Text on 7/27/2021 (cds). No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guasto v. I.C. System, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Guasto
Represented By: Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi
Represented By: Thomas John Patti, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I.C. System, Inc.
Represented By: Dale Thomas Golden
Represented By: Sangeeta G. Philip-Spengler
Represented By: Charles James McHale, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?