Toruno v. Chi-Ada Corporation et al
| Sandra Toruno |
| Chi-Ada Corporation and Bartholomew Okoro |
| 1:2021cv22752 |
| July 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Plaintiff's MOTION for Order to Show Cause for Defendants' Improper Pretrial Conduct, MOTION to Compel Compliance with Court's Order ( Responses due by 9/30/2021) by Sandra Toruno. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email September 3, 2021, #2 Exhibit B - Email September 10, 2021, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 12
Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike #8 Answer to Complaint, , Plaintiff's MOTION for More Definite Statement by Sandra Toruno. Responses due by 9/15/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Compliance with Court Order (ECF No. 5) by Sandra Toruno re 5 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,,,,,,, (Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 10
Statement of: of Claim by Sandra Toruno re 5 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,,,,,,, (Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Emelike Nwosuocha on behalf of Chi-Ada Corporation, Bartholomew Okoro (Nwosuocha, Emelike)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Chi-Ada Corporation, Bartholomew Okoro. Attorney Emelike Nwosuocha added to party Chi-Ada Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Emelike Nwosuocha added to party Bartholomew Okoro(pty:dft). (Nwosuocha, Emelike)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Sandra Toruno. Bartholomew Okoro served on 7/30/2021, answer due 8/20/2021. (Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Sandra Toruno. Chi-Ada Corporation served on 7/30/2021, answer due 8/20/2021. (Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. ("FLSA"). In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED to comply with the following procedures: Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff is required to state a "short and plain statement of the claim." While this Rule places only a light burden on a plaintiff, the Court requires complaints filed under the FLSA to include, at a minimum, a statement setting forth the following with respect to each Plaintiff: (a) An initial estimate of the total amount of alleged unpaid wages; (b) A preliminary calculation of such wages; (c) The approximate period during which the alleged FLSA violations occurred; and (d) The nature of the wages (e.g., overtime or straight time). Plaintiff is directed to file a "Statement of Claim" by August 13, 2021. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly serve a copy of this Order, the Statement of Claim, and copies of all supporting documents (including time sheets, pay stubs, etc.) upon counsel for Defendant(s) once an appearance has been made or at the time the Statement of Claim is filed (if defense counsel has already appeared). Defendant(s) shall then file a "Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim" setting forth in detail any defenses to Plaintiff's claim(s) and serve copies of all supporting documents within twenty (20) days of being served with Plaintiff's Statement of Claim. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Chi-Ada Corporation, Bartholomew Okoro. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(ebz)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Chi-Ada Corporation, Bartholomew Okoro. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14882677, filed by Sandra Toruno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons for Corporation, #3 Summon(s) Summons for Individual)(Saavedra, Nathaly)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
