Clarke v. United Collection Bureau, Inc.
| Devon Clarke |
| United Collection Bureau, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv22883 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| James Lawrence King |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 10/7/2021. See attached document for full details. (jw)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Devon Clarke (Patti, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Devon Clarke (Patti, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by United Collection Bureau, Inc.. (Merical, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance Re: Estimated Trial Length (Three Days) by Devon Clarke re #3 Order, (Patti, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by United Collection Bureau, Inc. (Merical, Joseph) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Defendant to File Estimated Length of Trial re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by United Collection Bureau, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 8/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (jw)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint for Injunctive Relief) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14912023, filed by United Collection Bureau, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Merical, Joseph) Modified Text on 8/9/2021 (cds). No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clarke v. United Collection Bureau, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Devon Clarke | |
| Represented By: | Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi |
| Represented By: | Thomas John Patti, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Collection Bureau, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Kendall Merical |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
