Milic v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.
Mario Milic |
Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. |
1:2021cv22969 |
August 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jonathan Goodman |
Robert N Scola |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER Granting #7 Motion to Compel Arbitration. The Plaintiff is compelled to submit his claims to arbitration, and the case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 9/23/2021. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. PER DE#11 (cds) |
Filing 10 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B)(Holman, Steve) |
Filing 9 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.. (Holman, Steve) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Mario Milic. Replies due by 9/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 2021 Annual Report filed with Florida Department of State)(Notari, Adria) |
Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.. Responses due by 9/7/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Holman, Steve) |
Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court denies without prejudice the Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration #5 for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1(a)(3). Local Rule 7.1(a)(3) requires an attorney filing a motion in a civil case to confer in a good-faith effort with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by the relief sought in an attempt to resolve the issues raised in the motion. The filing attorney must then include in the motion a statement certifying to the Court either that (1) counsel for the movant conferred with all parties or relevant non-parties in good faith but was unable to resolve the issues raised in the motion or (2) counsel for the movant made reasonable, identifiable efforts to confer with all parties and relevant non-parties but has been unable to do so. See S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3). "The purpose of the rule is to ensure judicial economy and prevent courts from considering issues the parties could agree on independently, and to ascertain whether the Court need wait for a response from the opposing party before deciding the motion." Aguilar v. United Floor Crew, Inc., No. 14-Civ-61605, 2014 WL 6751663, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 1, 2014) (Bloom, J.). Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (ntd) |
Filing 5 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.. Responses due by 9/7/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Holman, Steve) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN'S DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 8/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 3 Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to the Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 8/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Seaman's Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14931877, filed by Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(Holman, Steve) Modified Text on 8/17/2021 (cds). No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Milic v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mario Milic | |
Represented By: | Adria G Notari |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Steve Holman |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Bradford Maltzman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.