Brito v. ABC BISCAYNE LLC et al
Carlos Brito |
ABC BISCAYNE LLC and Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. |
1:2021cv23002 |
August 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Beth Bloom |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 9/27/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement as to Defendants ABC Biscayne LLC and Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, INC. by Carlos Brito (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Armando Cordoves, Jr on behalf of ABC BISCAYNE LLC, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. Attorney Armando Cordoves, Jr added to party ABC BISCAYNE LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Armando Cordoves, Jr added to party Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.(pty:dft). (Cordoves, Armando) |
Filing 8 ORDER ON DEFAULT PROCEDURES. If Defendants fail to file any response to the Complaint, Plaintiff shall submit a Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default with respect to Defendants no later than September 27, 2021. ABC BISCAYNE LLC response due 9/20/2021; Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. response due 9/20/2021. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 9/14/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Carlos Brito. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. served on 8/23/2021, answer due 9/13/2021. (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Carlos Brito. ABC BISCAYNE LLC served on 8/23/2021, answer due 9/13/2021. (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report by Anthony Joseph Perez on behalf of Carlos Brito (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL, SCHEDULING REPORT, AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 8/18/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ABC BISCAYNE LLC, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(ebz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ABC BISCAYNE LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14939046, filed by Carlos Brito. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.