Perpall v. Valdez et al
| Fabian Perpall |
| Pablo Valdez, Terry Mullins, Banite Jean and Patresia Moreland |
| 1:2021cv23106 |
| August 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| K Michael Moore |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 3] is GRANTED by default and Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Alternatively, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court shall Close this Case. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/12/2021. See attached document for full details. (yar)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER. On or before OCTOBER 1, 2021, Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion, ensuring that his response is executed under penalty of perjury. In the alternative, on or before OCTOBER 1, 2021, Plaintiff may, if he so chooses, file an Amended Complaint on the form provided with this Order, stating a basis for federal jurisdiction, along with specific factual allegations as to each named Defendant, explaining how and when they violated his constitutional facts, together with a prayer for relief. Plaintiff is cautioned that each claim should be numbered in a separate paragraph and should include short and plain statements. Plaintiff's failure to timely respond to the Motion or file an Amended Complaint may result in the Defendants' motion being granted by default pursuant to Local Rule 7.l(c), or this action being dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/2/2021. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner) form) (daa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 9/2/2021. See attached document for full details. (daa)
|
| Filing 4 Amended Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Judge K. Michael Moore no longer assigned to case. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis no longer assigned to case. (daa) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Banite Jean, Patresia Moreland, Terry Mullins, Pablo Valdez. Responses due by 9/10/2021 (Zaron, Erica) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (scn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Civil Rights Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14963745, filed by Banite Jean, Terry Mullins, Pablo Valdez, Patresia Moreland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B Civil Cover Sheet)(Zaron, Erica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
