Gonzalez v. Burger King Corporation et al
| Jesus Gonzalez |
| Burger King Corporation doing business as Burger King #71 and Zebra Properties, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv23434 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER administratively closing case in light of Plaintiff's #11 Notice of Settlement, which indicates that this matter has settled in full. The parties are hereby notified that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, they must file a Stipulation or Notice of Dismissal and/or Settlement Agreement along with any other pertinent document necessary to conclude this action. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 10/19/2021. (jsi)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Jesus Gonzalez (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jesus Gonzalez. Zebra Properties, Inc. served on 9/28/2021, response/answer due 10/19/2021. (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, 6 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,,,,, by Burger King Corporation, Zebra Properties, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Singer, Suzanne) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew Joseph Miller on behalf of Burger King Corporation, Zebra Properties, Inc.. Attorney Andrew Joseph Miller added to party Burger King Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Joseph Miller added to party Zebra Properties, Inc.(pty:dft). (Miller, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Suzanne Ashelle Singer on behalf of Burger King Corporation, Zebra Properties, Inc.. Attorney Suzanne Ashelle Singer added to party Burger King Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Suzanne Ashelle Singer added to party Zebra Properties, Inc.(pty:dft). (Singer, Suzanne) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster an early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED as follows: Within fourteen (14) days of service of the Complaint, Defendant shall file a report with the Court indicating whether it agrees to (1) remediate the deficiencies identified in the Complaint, (2) entry of an injunction to ensure future compliance, and (3) pay Plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees and costs, as determined by the Court or agreement by the parties. If so, Defendant shall include a reasonable timeline for remediation. If, upon review of the report, the Court finds that Defendant intends to remediate the property within a reasonable time, the action shall be stayed. If requested, the Court may grant proportional discovery to verify Defendant's remediation of the ADA deficiencies outlined in the Complaint. After receiving notice from the parties that the ADA deficiencies outlined in the Complaint have been remediated, the parties shall submit to the Court a proposed order of dismissal, including an injunction for future compliance and an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Disputes will be resolved by the Court. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jesus Gonzalez. Burger King Corporation served on 9/29/2021, answer due 10/20/2021. (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Burger King Corporation, Zebra Properties, Inc. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Burger King Corporation, Zebra Properties, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15042156, filed by Jesus Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons to Burger King Corporation, #3 Summon(s) Summons to Zebra Properties, Inc.)(Cunningham, Juan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
