Harriman v. HIG Capital, LLC et al
| James Walter Harriman |
| HIG Capital, LLC and Wellpath, LLC |
| 1:2021cv23486 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 8:21-cv-02344, filed 10/05/2021. (bb) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:21-cv-23486 electronically transferred out to Florida Middle. (scn) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING COMPLAINT TO MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA: The Clerk shall CLOSE this case and take all necessary steps to ensure the prompt TRANSFER of the action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as MOOT. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 10/4/2021. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Walter Harriman. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against HIG Capital, LLC, Wellpath, LLC. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by James Walter Harriman.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.