Ariza v. Longchamp USA, Inc.
| Victor Ariza |
| Longchamp USA, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv23577 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/15/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Victor Ariza (Hannah, Roderick) |
| Reset Deadlines Longchamp USA, Inc. answer due 11/15/2021. Per DE#6. (cqs) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant shall have through and including November 15, 2021 to respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/3/2021. (cvl)
|
| Filing 5 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Longchamp USA, Inc.. Attorney Nicholas Michael Nash, II added to party Longchamp USA, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Nash, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Victor Ariza. Longchamp USA, Inc. served on 10/14/2021, response/answer due 11/4/2021. (Hannah, Roderick) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Longchamp USA, Inc. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Longchamp USA, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15084349, filed by Victor Ariza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Hannah, Roderick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ariza v. Longchamp USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Victor Ariza | |
| Represented By: | Pelayo M. Duran |
| Represented By: | Roderick Victor Hannah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Longchamp USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Michael Nash, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
