Arroyo v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff: Richard Arroyo
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Case Number: 1:2021cv23820
Filed: October 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Federico A Moreno
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2021 Filing 13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss #6 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Responses due by 1/6/2022 (Morel, Miguel)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Defendant's response is due by no later than 12/29/2021. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/20/2021. (mmd)
December 17, 2021 Filing 11 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by National Railroad Passenger Corporation identifying Other Affiliate Passenger Railroad Insurance Limited, Other Affiliate Washington Terminal Company for National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Morel, Miguel)
December 15, 2021 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #6 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit 1)(Persaud, Alan)
December 15, 2021 Filing 9 STATUS REPORT Defendant's Removal Status Report by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Persaud, Alan)
December 6, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE in Removal Cases. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/2/2021. See attached document for full details. (mmd)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in view of the Plaintiff's filing of the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/6/2021. (mmd)
December 1, 2021 Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against National Railroad Passenger Corporation, filed by Richard Arroyo.(Remer, Jason)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall respond to the complaint by no later than December 1, 2021. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 11/22/2022. (mmd)
November 20, 2021 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM as to Counts II and III by Richard Arroyo. (Remer, Jason)
November 10, 2021 Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM as to Counts II and III by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Responses due by 11/24/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - JCC Agreement)(Morel, Miguel)
October 29, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs)
October 29, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15134527, filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Return of Service Affidavit, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Filings, #4 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing)(Morel, Miguel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arroyo v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Arroyo
Represented By: Daniel H. Hunt
Represented By: Jason Saul Remer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
Represented By: Miguel Angel Morel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Represented By: Alan Persaud
Represented By: Miguel Angel Morel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?