Trust v. Thomas
Christiana Trust |
Wanda Thomas |
1:2021cv23873 |
November 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jose E Martinez |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT as to #13 Transmittal Letter Sent (jao) |
Filing 13 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order On Motion To Remand. to: 11th Judicial Circuit Court. State Court Case Number: 12-028261-CA-01 (kpe) |
![]() |
Civil Case Terminated per DE #12 Order. Closing Case. (kpe) |
Filing 11 Supplemental of COMPLAINT filed by Wanda Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(kpe) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #7 And To Ratify Orders Entered By The Trial Court filed by Wanda Thomas. Replies due by 11/29/2021. (kpe) |
Filing 9 MOTION/Petition to Correct Docket by Wanda Thomas. Responses due by 12/2/2021 (kpe) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 8 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (mc) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Christiana Trust. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Diaz, Adam) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam Alexander Diaz on behalf of Christiana Trust. Attorney Adam Alexander Diaz added to party Christiana Trust(pty:pla). (Diaz, Adam) |
Filing 5 EMERGENCY MOTION to Vacate Default Judgment Court Order by Wanda Thomas. Responses due by 11/19/2021. (jas) |
Filing 4 EMERGENCY MOTION for Stay of Execution of Writ of Restitution from the Lower Court by Wanda Thomas. Responses due by 11/19/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(kpe) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Wanda Thomas. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL OF ACTIOIN (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $402.00 IFP Filed, filed by Wanda Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(cds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trust v. Thomas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christiana Trust | |
Represented By: | Derek Richard Griffith |
Represented By: | Fazia S. Corsbie |
Represented By: | Roy Alan Diaz |
Represented By: | Adam Alexander Diaz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wanda Thomas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.