Leon v. Apple, Inc.
| Francisco Leon |
| Apple, Inc. and Apple, Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Apple Store |
| 1:2021cv23930 |
| November 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jacqueline Becerra |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR CONSENT MATTERS The above-captioned cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra to conduct any and all further proceedings in this case, including trial, entry of final judgment, and any post-trial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed R. Civ. P. 73. Judge Jose E. Martinez no longer assigned as presider/referral judge(s) in case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/22/2021. See attached document for full details. (jbs) Modified text on 12/23/2021 (jbs).
|
| Filing 18 Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge signed by all parties . Filed by Apple, Inc. (Sarangoulis, Roman) |
|
Filing 17
PAPERLESS ORDER. This cause came before the Court upon Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. #9 . Shortly after Defendant moved to dismiss, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint, ECF No. #12 , and Defendant then filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses, ECF No. #15 . Accordingly, upon due consideration, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 12/20/2021. (hgz)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters, and for a Report and Recommendation on all dispositive matters. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/20/2021. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 15 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint by Apple, Inc.. (Sarangoulis, Roman) |
| Filing 14 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Apple, Inc. (Schwartz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 13 Joint Election to Jurisdiction for Final Disposition of Motions . Filed by Apple, Inc. (Schwartz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., filed by Francisco Leon.(Hoogerwoerd, Peter) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement by Apple, Inc. (Schwartz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT by Apple, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Schwartz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Apple, Inc.. Responses due by 12/3/2021 (Schwartz, Jennifer) |
| Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Apple, Inc. response/answer due 11/22/2021. (ls)(per DE #8) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before November 22, 2021. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/13/2021. (ah05)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schwartz, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 10/24/2022 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Calendar Call set for 10/20/2022 01:30 PM in Miami Division before Judge Jose E. Martinez.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation., ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Court Practice in Removal Cases. ( Removal Status Report due by 11/24/2021.) Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra for a Settlement Conference. Except as provided in Local Rule 16.2(e), the appearance of counsel and each party, or a representative with full settlement authority, is mandatory. The Court normally mandates that appearance be in person; however, given the restrictions caused by COVID-19, Judge Becerra will dictate how participation will occur. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/10/2021. (ah05)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer A. Schwartz on behalf of Apple, Inc. (Schwartz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15156857, filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sarangoulis, Roman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
